decorative image for blog on centos vs debian
June 20, 2024

CentOS vs. Debian: Key Similarities and Differences

Operating Systems
Open Source

By and

Choosing the right Linux distribution can be a big decision for any organization. For organizations considering CentOS vs. Debian, understanding the key differences between the two is key, especially given that as of June 30, all versions of CentOS are end of life (EOL). 

In this blog, we explore CentOS vs. Debian, comparing architecture, package management, upgrading, support, and more. These comparisons generally hold true for CentOS replacements such as Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux, which are also derived from RHEL and have stable releases (as opposed to rolling updates like CentOS Stream).

Table of Contents

  1. CentOS vs. Debian: Overview
  2. Final Thoughts
Back to top

CentOS vs. Debian: Overview

CentOS and Debian are Enterprise Linux distributions that spawn from opposite ends of the candle.

CentOS is a free downstream rebuild of the commercial Red Hat Enterprise Linux distribution where, in contrast, Debian is the free upstream distribution that is the base for other distributions, including the Ubuntu Linux distribution.

As with many Linux distributions, CentOS and Debian are generally more alike than different; it isn’t until we dig a little deeper that we find where they branch.

Get the Decision Maker's Guide to Enterprise Linux

If you're trying to decide on the best Enterprise Linux distribution for your company, this guide is a must-read. Featuring battlecards for 20 of the top free and paid Enterprise Linux distributions, and analysis from our Linux experts, it's a guide every decision maker should have at their disposal.

Download for Free

CentOS vs. Debian: Architecture

The available supported architectures can be the determining factor as to whether a distro is a viable option or not. Debian and CentOS are both very popular for x86_64/AMD64, but what other archs are supported by each?

Both Debian and CentOS support AArch64/ARM64, armhf/armhfp , i386 , ppc64el/ppc64le. (Note: armhf/armhfp and i386 are supported in CentOS 7 only.)

CentOS 7 additionally supports POWER9 while Debian and CentOS 8 do not. CentOS 7 focuses on the x86_64/AMD64 architecture with the other archs released through the AltArch SIG (Alternate Architecture Special Interest Group) with CentOS 8 supporting x86_64/AMD64, AArch64 and ppc64le equally.

Debian supports MIPSel, MIPS64el and s390x while CentOS does not. Much like CentOS 8, Debian does not favor one arch over another —all supported architectures are supported equally. 

Rocky Linux 9 and AlmaLinux 9 support x86_64/AMD64, aarch64, ppc64le, and s390x.

CentOS vs. Debian: Package Management

Most Linux distributions have some form of package manager nowadays, with some more complex and feature-rich than others.

CentOS (and CentOS Stream and RHEL derivatives) uses the RPM package format and YUM/DNF as the package manager.

Debian uses the DEB package format and dpkg/APT as the package manager.

Both offer full-feature package management with network-based repository support, dependency checking and resolution. If you’re familiar with one but not the other, you may have a little trouble switching over, but they're not overwhelmingly different. They both have similar features, just available through a different interface.

CentOS vs. Debian: Filesystems

Is the default filesystem a consideration for you? If so, XFS fans can rejoice that it is the CentOS default. Those who are more of the EXT4 persuasion may prefer Debian. Both XFS and EXT4 are popular and well-supported options for CentOS and Debian, so the default filesystem is likely not a determining factor. Besides, both distros support numerous other filesystems, such as ext2/3, NFSv3/4, btrfs, SMB, GFS2 and many more. (Note: btrfs is supported by CentOS 7 only.)

CentOS does not officially support some of the filesystems that Debian offers. Most notably is ZFS. Debian provides ZFS support through a DKMS contribution, but ZFS is not supported on CentOS at all (although ZFS support is available through 3rd parties).

CentOS vs. Debian: Kernel

Need the latest/greatest Linux kernel in your environment to support the newest hardware or kernel features? In that case, you may find Debian’s 4.19 kernel appealing.

CentOS does have kernel-lt-5.4 and kernel-ml-5.10 packages available through 3rd party repos, but CentOS ships with kernel 3.10 (CentOS 7) or 4.18 (CentOS 8).

Both Debian and Red Hat backport security fixes from newer kernels to their current kernels, though, so falling behind with regards to security isn’t usually a concern.

CentOS vs. Debian: Upgrading

One feature that gives Debian an advantage is that of major version upgrades. CentOS supports minor version upgrades, such as CentOS 7.8 to CentOS 7.9, but does not support (or only weakly supports) major version upgrades, such as from CentOS 6 to CentOS 7 or CentOS 8. 

CentOS major releases typically have a 10-year lifespan, but in-place upgrades can leave a system in limbo, somewhere between one major release and another, so we don’t typically recommend them. (Note: We recommend offline/parallel build upgrades between CentOS major releases; watch this video to learn more.)

Debian’s ability to upgrade from one stable release to another, such as from Debian 9 Stretch (stable) to Debian 10 Buster (stable), can help keep a system up to date after many years. Debian typically releases a new major version on a 2-year release cycle with 3 years of full support and an additional 2 years of LTS (Long Term Support) for a 5-year lifespan, so being able to upgrade to the next stable major release is handy.

Major version upgrades aren’t of much use to those who deploy systems in a more ephemeral manner as it is often relatively easy to update the base images to a newer version. However, for those who deploy systems that are expected to have a multi-year lifespan, major version upgrades can pose a significant level of effort.

CentOS vs. Debian: Support

As of June 30, 2024, all versions of CentOS are EOL. The only way to get CentOS support and security updates is through 3rd parties, such as OpenLogic.

Debian is primarily community supported, including offering a bug tracker. Debian also offers a list of consultants that can be hired to help resolve issues, but those consultants operate independently. You can also partner with OpenLogic for SLA-backed Debian support.

Some downstream distributions based on Debian have commercial support options; Ubuntu is the most prolific example.

Back to top

Final Thoughts

In the end, choosing the distribution that is best for you comes down to technical requirements, internal resources, support options and business decisions. If you are exploring CentOS alternatives and willing to stand up a new system, Debian could be a wise choice, particularly if your engineering team has experience with distributions that use DEB packages.

Editor's Note: This blog was originally published on February 11, 2021 and was updated on June 20, 2024 for accuracy. 

Need Help with Debian or CentOS? 

Our unbiased Enterprise Linux experts are here to provide technical support and professional services, including CentOS 7 LTS through 2029 and migration guidance. 

Chat with A Linux EXPERT

Additional Resources

Back to top
headshot-rich-alloway

Rich Alloway

Enterprise Linux Developer, OpenLogic by Perforce

Rich Alloway has over 25 years of professional Linux experience in academic, Internet service provider and telco carrier environments. He has filled many production roles: SysAdmin, Systems/Network/RF Engineer and CTO. He is currently a member of the Enterprise Linux Team at OpenLogic by Perforce, and serves as a contributor on the Rocky Linux QA and Testing Team.

Lance Dillion Bio

Lance Dillon

Enterprise Architect

Lance has been working in the IT field for over 30 years, most of it concentrated on data centers and infrastructure. For the past 10 years he has focused on SaaS infrastructure, ensuring reliability, high availability, and scalability of systems. He has been working with CentOS and Linux distributions for the past 25 years.