Blog
November 14, 2024
Learn about Harbor and the benefits of using it for container image management in cloud-native environments like Kubernetes. In this blog, our expert describes key features and ideal use cases, and discusses the pros and cons of two Harbor alternatives.
What Is Harbor?
Harbor is an open source registry for securely storing and managing container images in cloud-native environments.
Originating as an internal project at VMWare, Harbor entered the open source scene in 2016. Its focus was clear: Storing and securing container images in a cloud-native environment. In its ideal configuration, Harbor is typically deployed to a Kubernetes cluster, where it provides container images from all sources a single home.
Providing a unified storage space proved invaluable when it came to managing images. As Harbor is capable of pulling from other registries as well as accepting user submissions, teams could route all images through their Harbor deployment, ensuring consistent policies would be applied. Vulnerability scanning, access control, signature verification — all of it could now be configured and controlled in one place.
Owing to its ease of use and substantial benefits, Harbor took off in popularity. By 2018, Harbor had joined the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) and reached “Graduated” status by 2020. Since then, Harbor has continued to grow and remains a staple in Kubernetes environments.
Back to topHarbor Registry Key Features
Harbor comes with a host of features tuned to address common challenges in containerized environments. Instead of jumping straight into a list of everything Harbor can do (which might be overwhelming), let’s start with some of the core concepts, and build an understanding of Harbor’s feature set piece by piece.
Interface
Once deployed, Harbor exposes a web interface for interacting and exploring its artifacts and configurations. In addition to this, an API is exposed such that common tools, like the Docker client, can push and pull images directly to the registry.
Users
The interface, and much of the registry’s functionality, is locked by permissions granted to users. In the simplest cases, users can be created by Harbor itself and managed internally. However, this doesn’t scale particularly well, so Harbor also provides integration into other popular services such as OIDC, Active Directory, and LDAP.
Projects
Artifacts within Harbor are owned by a project. This grouping allows settings and permissions to be tuned for sets of artifacts as opposed to a purely global level. From there, users can be granted a role in a project, such as Guest (read-only), Developer (read-write), or Project Admin (read-write-configure).
Security
Aside from access control, Harbor includes several other critical security features. By utilizing popular image scanners, such as Trivy, images can be automatically scanned for known vulnerabilities. The results of these scans can be leveraged to prevent pulling of artifacts with unaddressed security issues.
On top of scanning, Harbor also includes support for signature verification. After using a tool like Notary or Cosign to sign an artifact, Harbor is capable of verifying each signature and rejecting artifacts which fail the verification process.
Additional Features
With the core functionality out of the way, we can now take a brief look at some of the other features of Harbor.
- Storage of OCI Artifacts – In addition to container images, Harbor can store OCI artifacts such as Helm charts.
- High-Availability – As Harbor deploys to Kubernetes, it follows the common pattern of providing a high-availability configuration, ensuring maximum uptime.
- Registry Replication – While users can manually push and pull from the registry, images may also be automatically replicated to and from external registries. This is highly configurable, allowing for control over how and when artifacts are replicated.
- Observability – Harbor natively supports a standard suite of observability features, including logging, metrics, and tracing.
- SBOM – As well as scanning artifacts, Harbor can generate a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), which acts as a list of all found dependencies within an image.
Harbor Registry Installation
Harbor provides two paths for installation:
- The first is to use their own installer, which deploys Harbor locally using Docker. This is a great option to try Harbor out or for small teams which will be leveraging Harbor in a limited fashion.
- The second path is to deploy to Kubernetes. This is accomplished via Helm and enables high-availability configurations. The Kubernetes deployment is the recommended approach for most teams.
To get started with either of these paths, we recommend following the official documentation for the most up-to-date instructions.
Back to topNeed Help With Harbor?
OpenLogic now offers Gold-level, SLA-backed support for Harbor. Talk to an expert today to learn more or request a quote for Harbor technical support.
Using Harbor for Container Image Management
With the high-level understanding of Harbor out of the way, we can dig a bit further into understanding when Harbor is worth considering. Typically, as organizations grow and their usage of containers increases, hosting your own registry becomes a stronger choice. While the operation cost of Harbor is low, any new piece of infrastructure must be maintained. As such, if your organization or team makes light use of containers, it may be better to look at cloud-based providers first.
Let’s take a look at three scenarios in which Harbor could be leveraged.
Private Registry
Let’s suppose your team is building and consuming their own container images. While these images shouldn’t contain any sensitive information, they may hold proprietary software or similar materials that need to remain safe. This, understandably, makes externally hosted options less desirable.
By deploying Harbor locally as a private registry, images can be kept on-site, greatly reducing the potential for accidental leaks. Furthermore, corporate security policies are enforced on all images, ensuring scanning and signing take place without ever leaving the network.
Proxy Registry
Now let’s consider a case in which a team makes heavy use of public images. This is a fairly common setup and typically not an issue. However, depending on how these images are being consumed, the team may find themselves running into rate limiting and bandwidth issues.
In this case, by using Harbor to mirror an external registry, each image only needs to be pulled by Harbor once, greatly reducing the load on the external service. As an added benefit, Harbor will remain available even when the external registry is not.
Air-Gapped Registry
Finally, let’s consider a critical system which relies on both public and internal container images to function. For security reasons, this environment is air-gapped, preventing access to public registries.
Here, a self-hosted image registry is the only viable option, making Harbor a smart choice. Images can be manually marshalled in and assigned different security policies by grouping based on source. On top of that, Harbor provides a mechanism for manually updating the security vulnerability database in its scanner, enabling up-to-date scans without a connection to the internet.
Back to topHarbor Alternatives
Many options exist within the container registry space. As Harbor is a CNCF graduated project, it is typically the recommended choice for organizations looking to host their container images on-site. Instead of direct comparisons, let’s take a look at two alternatives with some significant tradeoffs.
Sonatype Nexus
Nexus is an artifact registry in a much broader sense than Harbor. While it does support acting as a container image registry, its strength lies primarily in the range of artifacts it can hold. This includes artifacts for Docker, Go, Maven, Python, Yum, and more. The advantage here is clear: If container images are smaller component of your broader technical needs, a general-purpose repository can provide quite a bit of value.
However, these features come with a drawback: Container images are supported, but many of the security features are not. At the time of this writing, Nexus does not support signing or vulnerability scanning on container images.
Artifactory
Similar to Nexus, Artifactory supports a much wider range of artifact types. However, unlike Nexus, it does not sacrifice container image security features. Instead, its drawback is a common one: Cost. Artifactory is an offering form JFrog, and while it has a wide range of features, it requires a paid license for full functionality. A side effect of this is that Artifactory tends to leverage other offerings from JFrog as well.
When considering Artifactory, it’s important to evaluate the surrounding ecosystem and community. While we recommend open source solutions for their flexibility and community support, options like Artifactory may fit particular use cases better.
Back to topHarbor Container Registry FAQs
In this section, we'll answer some of the most common questions about Harbor.
What Is the Difference Between Docker Hub vs. Harbor?
Docker Hub is a popular cloud-based registry. It provides many of the features available in Harbor but cannot be hosted on-site. Additionally, some functionality is gated behind paid tiers of membership. By comparison, Harbor’s self-hosted nature is ideal for teams needing on-site security and control over their registry.
Is Harbor Free?
Yes. Harbor is both free and open source under the Apache License 2.0.
Can I Use Harbor With Kubernetes?
Yes. Harbor is built from the ground up to support Kubernetes, including high-availability configurations.
Where Can I Get Harbor Support?
The Harbor community is active and you can connect with other Harbor users on X and/or attend biweekly community meetings on Zoom to get updates and submit feedback. There are also distribution lists for both Harbor users and developers to join.
However, there is no guarantee someone in the community will have expertise or knowledge that relates to your particular use case, or that you'll be able to get help quickly. This is why some teams opt for SLA-backed support provided by vendors like OpenLogic. The advantage of this is having an exact timeline for resolution and the ability to talk directly, 24-7, with an Enterprise Architect.
Back to topFinal Thoughts
As covered in this blog, Harbor is an excellent choice for container image management, particularly in instances where you want to host your registry on-site, mirror an external registry, or have an air-gapped environment. As a project, Harbor is well-maintained and benefits from a robust community of contributors. While it is free to deploy, all infrastructure software requires some degree of maintenance, so it's always a good idea to consider the "soft cost" in terms of your team's time to decide whether it makes sense to get support from a third party like OpenLogic.