<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How OpenLogic Gives Back to Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2008/02/how-openlogic-gives-back-to-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2008/02/how-openlogic-gives-back-to-open-source/</link>
	<description>Openlogic's Community Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:05:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Governance: OpenLogic expands its Library and launches its Comparison Matrix &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2008/02/how-openlogic-gives-back-to-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-101475</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Governance: OpenLogic expands its Library and launches its Comparison Matrix &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2008/02/how-openlogic-gives-back-to-open-source/#comment-101475</guid>
		<description>[...] Few months ago Matt Asay argued that OpenLogic&#8217;s success could have been achieved at the expense of the projects that made it possible, Kim replied on the subject explaining how OpenLogic gives back. As a matter of fact open source software is a proper free market, where appropriating returns from commons is challenging. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Few months ago Matt Asay argued that OpenLogic&#8217;s success could have been achieved at the expense of the projects that made it possible, Kim replied on the subject explaining how OpenLogic gives back. As a matter of fact open source software is a proper free market, where appropriating returns from commons is challenging. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2008/02/how-openlogic-gives-back-to-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-91440</link>
		<dc:creator>W.Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2008/02/how-openlogic-gives-back-to-open-source/#comment-91440</guid>
		<description>The article from Matt Assay about OpenLogic basing their business on Open Source software with possibility of no return or give-back by the company, and your eloquent response help to keep thought process and dialog thriving in the area. 

However I would not feel totally comfortable accepting your response - on &quot;face value&quot; so to speak , not because it clearly and intelligently lays out the relationship of Openlogic with developers and the community, but because there is no way to verify or support any claim or statement made in support of the company&#039;s position.

It is incumbent that OpenLogic is willing to publicly identify at least one relationship with Open Source Software vendor business or developer group that is mentioned in online response, and  secure a &quot;published&quot; endorsement from at least one named individual or group from the open source development community that it supposedly supports.

i am confident that such effort will be invaluable and successful in OpenLogic marketing program and provide positive publicity to/for the Open source development community.  

Otherwise, statements as made can be construed as mere &quot;public Relations&quot; stunts with no basis in fact or reality.

W. Anderson
kimalcorp@nac.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article from Matt Assay about OpenLogic basing their business on Open Source software with possibility of no return or give-back by the company, and your eloquent response help to keep thought process and dialog thriving in the area. </p>
<p>However I would not feel totally comfortable accepting your response &#8211; on &#8220;face value&#8221; so to speak , not because it clearly and intelligently lays out the relationship of Openlogic with developers and the community, but because there is no way to verify or support any claim or statement made in support of the company&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>It is incumbent that OpenLogic is willing to publicly identify at least one relationship with Open Source Software vendor business or developer group that is mentioned in online response, and  secure a &#8220;published&#8221; endorsement from at least one named individual or group from the open source development community that it supposedly supports.</p>
<p>i am confident that such effort will be invaluable and successful in OpenLogic marketing program and provide positive publicity to/for the Open source development community.  </p>
<p>Otherwise, statements as made can be construed as mere &#8220;public Relations&#8221; stunts with no basis in fact or reality.</p>
<p>W. Anderson<br />
<a href="mailto:kimalcorp@nac.net">kimalcorp@nac.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
