<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSBC: Downloads to Dollars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/</link>
	<description>Openlogic's Community Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:05:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brooks Moses</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-53230</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks Moses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/#comment-53230</guid>
		<description>One of the things I like is places which make the information optional.  I&#039;ve filled in the optional info, when I was actually interested in hearing from the company -- especially when they framed it as a &quot;we consider this an equitable trade of information for software, but if you don&#039;t, here&#039;s the direct download link&quot;.

It&#039;s also affected by the value of the software.  Sun&#039;s operating system and compilers, for example -- yeah, I&#039;ll fill out contact info for that, because I recognize that it&#039;s a quite substantial bit of software that they&#039;re giving me in return.  A small utility that I&#039;ll use for five minutes ... not so much.  And registration forms for hardware drivers annoy me; I&#039;ve already paid the company for the driver by using their hardware.

Also, I suspect that the numbers get skewed a bit, by people doing multiple downloads (or not).  I know that I&#039;ve downloaded PuTTY a couple of dozen times in the last three years, just because it&#039;s easier to downloaded it than carry around a copy.  If they wanted me to fill out a registration every time, I&#039;d carry around the copy instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I like is places which make the information optional.  I&#8217;ve filled in the optional info, when I was actually interested in hearing from the company &#8212; especially when they framed it as a &#8220;we consider this an equitable trade of information for software, but if you don&#8217;t, here&#8217;s the direct download link&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also affected by the value of the software.  Sun&#8217;s operating system and compilers, for example &#8212; yeah, I&#8217;ll fill out contact info for that, because I recognize that it&#8217;s a quite substantial bit of software that they&#8217;re giving me in return.  A small utility that I&#8217;ll use for five minutes &#8230; not so much.  And registration forms for hardware drivers annoy me; I&#8217;ve already paid the company for the driver by using their hardware.</p>
<p>Also, I suspect that the numbers get skewed a bit, by people doing multiple downloads (or not).  I know that I&#8217;ve downloaded PuTTY a couple of dozen times in the last three years, just because it&#8217;s easier to downloaded it than carry around a copy.  If they wanted me to fill out a registration every time, I&#8217;d carry around the copy instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Flaschen</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-53031</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Flaschen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/#comment-53031</guid>
		<description>This annoys me.  If someone is interested in service, you&#039;ll here from them.  They won&#039;t just forget about a product they find valuable (and need help with).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This annoys me.  If someone is interested in service, you&#8217;ll here from them.  They won&#8217;t just forget about a product they find valuable (and need help with).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Cooke</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-52105</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/#comment-52105</guid>
		<description>reply to Jesse: 

Correct, I absolutely hate giving away my real email address and even worse my real world address. I will always use a fake address if they want an address and there&#039;s no physical shipping involved and will always use a webmail based email address (preferably an anonymous one) when an email address is required for something.

I have been burned before where I&#039;ve been deluged with spam and junk mail when my details were sold on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reply to Jesse: </p>
<p>Correct, I absolutely hate giving away my real email address and even worse my real world address. I will always use a fake address if they want an address and there&#8217;s no physical shipping involved and will always use a webmail based email address (preferably an anonymous one) when an email address is required for something.</p>
<p>I have been burned before where I&#8217;ve been deluged with spam and junk mail when my details were sold on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/comment-page-1/#comment-51982</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Weinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 03:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/05/osbc-downloads-to-dollars/#comment-51982</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m missing something, but wouldn&#039;t it be sufficient to offer a prominent, well-made &quot;Enter your email address here to join our announcement list&quot; textbox? (and have multiple lists if you want to say different things to the technical bloggers than to the enterprise IT staff)

Unless the company wants to contact people who do not want to be contacted, I don&#039;t see how anything more intrusive could be helpful...  But maybe I&#039;m missing something.

As for my specific predelections, I&#039;m very happy to join the mailing lists of musical groups I value, I would generally join announcement lists for software I use (although it&#039;s not always that obvious, so often I forget to), and I would simply enter a fake (or temporary, if necessary) email in any form that required such before letting me download something.

Requiring contact info to recieve a download is more or less pointless, as it&#039;s trivial to submit false details if you choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something, but wouldn&#8217;t it be sufficient to offer a prominent, well-made &#8220;Enter your email address here to join our announcement list&#8221; textbox? (and have multiple lists if you want to say different things to the technical bloggers than to the enterprise IT staff)</p>
<p>Unless the company wants to contact people who do not want to be contacted, I don&#8217;t see how anything more intrusive could be helpful&#8230;  But maybe I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
<p>As for my specific predelections, I&#8217;m very happy to join the mailing lists of musical groups I value, I would generally join announcement lists for software I use (although it&#8217;s not always that obvious, so often I forget to), and I would simply enter a fake (or temporary, if necessary) email in any form that required such before letting me download something.</p>
<p>Requiring contact info to recieve a download is more or less pointless, as it&#8217;s trivial to submit false details if you choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
