<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Expert Community is Bullish on GPLv3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/04/the-expert-community-is-bullish-on-gplv3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/04/the-expert-community-is-bullish-on-gplv3/</link>
	<description>Open Source Governance, Scanning, Support, and Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/04/the-expert-community-is-bullish-on-gplv3/comment-page-1/#comment-32305</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/04/the-expert-community-is-bullish-on-gplv3/#comment-32305</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

I appreciate the request for the data - which I did include in my post - I shared questions and answers.

However, I did take a college statistics class and I know that you can&#039;t take the number of people that responded yes in a survey and then divide it by the total population invited!  You have to divide it by the people that responded!  Talk about trying to twist the data!

Stormy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>I appreciate the request for the data &#8211; which I did include in my post &#8211; I shared questions and answers.</p>
<p>However, I did take a college statistics class and I know that you can&#8217;t take the number of people that responded yes in a survey and then divide it by the total population invited!  You have to divide it by the people that responded!  Talk about trying to twist the data!</p>
<p>Stormy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/04/the-expert-community-is-bullish-on-gplv3/comment-page-1/#comment-32300</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openlogic.com/blogs/2007/04/the-expert-community-is-bullish-on-gplv3/#comment-32300</guid>
		<description>Since you&#039;re not a statistician, are you going make the raw survey data and methodology available so that others can do their own interpretation?  That would be kind of open sourcey (to coin a phrase).

This press release, http://linuxpr.com/releases/9601.html, says &quot;Forty-five Expert Community members corresponded [sic],&quot; so if I was spinning for the other side I might say &quot;fewer than 10% of open source developers support GPL V3&quot; (50% of 45 / 250+) or &quot;more than half (57%) of open source developers concerned about changes to GPL V3.&quot;   That would be about as accurate as your &quot;3-to-1 in favor&quot; spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re not a statistician, are you going make the raw survey data and methodology available so that others can do their own interpretation?  That would be kind of open sourcey (to coin a phrase).</p>
<p>This press release, <a href="http://linuxpr.com/releases/9601.html" rel="nofollow">http://linuxpr.com/releases/9601.html</a>, says &#8220;Forty-five Expert Community members corresponded [sic],&#8221; so if I was spinning for the other side I might say &#8220;fewer than 10% of open source developers support GPL V3&#8243; (50% of 45 / 250+) or &#8220;more than half (57%) of open source developers concerned about changes to GPL V3.&#8221;   That would be about as accurate as your &#8220;3-to-1 in favor&#8221; spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

